Thoughts from The Toppled Bollard:  

“Do Hamilton House shared mailings really generate higher response rates than those of our rivals?”    

In the first hour of the BETT Education Show at Olympia 2005 two customers of mine approached me with exactly the same question in relation to shared mailings.   

They posed an issue which I was to hear several times during the show.  “We are customers of yours,” they said, “but we have from time to time been tempted away from Hamilton House by your rivals through special offers.” 

As befits the fellow who writes the Toppled Bollard stories for Hamilton House I feigned shock, horror, palpitations and a headache at the mention of our esteemed rivals, and our customers dutifully smiled, before proceeding with their question. 

“What we found was that we got a lower response with them, than we do with Hamilton House.   But we can’t understand how this can be – surely you are all using the same methods, and your lists must be pretty much the same.” 

These were experienced mailers of schools and they knew as well as anyone that there were many possible explanations for this effect.  One reason could be the timing – response rates straight after Easter tend to be poorer than those achieved in early June for example.  The first couple of weeks of September often produce lower responses than mailings at the end of that month.  If they mailed with Hamilton House at a good time and with our rivals at a bad time, that could explain the difference in results. 

Another explanation could involve selectivity.  Each mailing house offers different selections in its shared mailings, and if ours fitted better with the customer’s target audience, we could again see this as a possible explanation for higher response rates through Hamilton House. 

But I do believe there is probably another explanation.  Five years ago we introduced the School Administrator’s Newsletter as the front item in most of our shared mailings, and this page has achieved a very high readership – not least because no one else writes regularly to these people who open the mail and pass it around.   We get a huge level of feedback from administrators who do not hesitate to tell us exactly what they would like covered in future newsletters.   I think they do see us as an important source of news and information. 

My view is that in many schools, when the mail arrives the administrator opens the pack with the newsletter in, reads that and hands out the mail from that pack.   (We make this easy by using polythene envelopes and ensuring that the newsletter can be seen the moment the envelope is picked up.)   Then, after reading the Newsletter and handing out the leaflets, they get on with looking at other mail – and since there is no incentive to handle other shared mailing packs these tend to get left until later – and may not always be reached at all.   

In other words I think that more leaflets sent with Hamilton House shared mailings actually end up in teachers’ pigeon holes than items sent out within the shared mailing packs of other companies – and this is what explains the higher response rates.

 

Tony Attwood

 

Direct line: 01536 399 013.    Email: Tony@hamilton-house.com    Sales line: 01536 399 000